In mathematics, curvature refers to any of a number of loosely related concepts in different areas of geometry. Intuitively, curvature is the amount by which a geometric object deviates from being flat, or straight in the case of a line, but this is defined in different ways depending on the context. There is a key distinction between extrinsic curvature, which is defined for objects embedded in another space (usually a Euclidean space) in a way that relates to the radius of curvature of circles that touch the object, and intrinsic curvature, which is defined at each point in a Riemannian manifold. This article deals primarily with the first concept.
The canonical example of extrinsic curvature is that of a circle, which has curvature equal to the inverse of its radius everywhere. Smaller circles bend more sharply, and hence have higher curvature. The curvature of a smooth curve is defined as the curvature of its osculating circle at each point.
In a plane, this is a scalar quantity, but in three or more dimensions it is described by a curvature vector that takes into account the direction of the bend as well as its sharpness. The curvature of more complex objects (such as surfaces or even curved n-dimensional spaces) is described by more complex objects from linear algebra, such as the general Riemann curvature tensor.
The remainder of this article discusses, from a mathematical perspective, some geometric examples of curvature: the curvature of a curve embedded in a plane and the curvature of a surface in Euclidean space. See the links below for further reading.
Contents |
For a plane curve C, the mathematical definition of curvature uses a parametric representation of C with respect to the arc length parametrization. It can be computed given any regular parametrization by a more complicated formula given below.
Let γ(s) be a regular parametric curve, where s is the arc length, or natural parameter. This determines the unit tangent vector T(s), the unit normal vector N(s), the curvature κ(s), the oriented or signed curvature k(s), and the radius of curvature R(s) at each point:
The curvature of a straight line is identically zero. The curvature of a circle of radius R is constant, i.e. it does not depend on the point and is equal to the reciprocal of the radius:
Thus for a circle, the radius of curvature is simply its radius. Straight lines and circles are the only plane curves whose curvature is constant. Given any curve C and a point P on it where the curvature is non-zero, there is a unique circle which most closely approximates the curve near P, the osculating circle at P. The radius of the osculating circle is the radius of curvature of C at this point.
Suppose that a particle moves on the plane with unit speed. Then the trajectory of the particle will trace out a curve C in the plane. Moreover, taking the time as the parameter, this provides a natural parametrization for C. The instantaneous direction of motion is given by the unit tangent vector P and the curvature measures how fast this vector rotates. If a curve keeps close to the same direction, the unit tangent vector changes very little and the curvature is small; where the curve undergoes a tight turn, the curvature is large.
The magnitude of curvature at points on physical curves can be measured in diopters (also spelled dioptre) — this is the convention in optics. A diopter has the dimension
The sign of the signed curvature k indicates the direction in which the unit tangent vector rotates as a function of the parameter along the curve. If the unit tangent rotates counterclockwise, then k > 0. If it rotates clockwise, then k < 0.
The signed curvature depends on the particular parametrization chosen for a curve. For example the unit circle can be parametrised by (counterclockwise, with k > 0), or by (clockwise, with k < 0). More precisely, the signed curvature depends only on the choice of orientation of an immersed curve. Every immersed curve in the plane admits two possible orientations.
For a plane curve given parametrically as , the curvature is
and the signed curvature k is
For the less general case of a plane curve given explicitly as the curvature is
Slightly abusing notation, the signed curvature may also be written in this way as
with the understanding that the curve is traversed in the direction of increasing x.
This quantity is common in physics and engineering; for example, in the equations of bending in beams, the 1D vibration of a tense string, approximations to the fluid flow around surfaces (in aeronautics), and the free surface boundary conditions in ocean waves. In such applications, the assumption is almost always made that the slope is small compared with unity, so that the approximation:
may be used. This approximation yields a straightforward linear equation describing the phenomenon, which would otherwise remain intractable.
If a curve is defined in polar coordinates as , then its curvature is
where here the prime refers to differentiation with respect to .
Consider the parabola . We can parametrize the curve simply as ,
Substituting
When the real line is structured as a metric space by defining distance between points p and q as arc length a(p,q), the triangle inequality obviously becomes an equality. The same holds of any curve in the real plane or higher dimensional space Euclidean space, whence the metric reveals no information about curvature, helicity, etc.
If however the straight-line distance or chord length between any two points on the curve is given as a second metric c(p,q), the two metrics together suffice to determine the magnitude of the curvature of the curve at every point on it to which an osculating circle can be fitted. This is true in Euclidean space of any finite dimensionality. It does not however determine other parameters such as the tangent to the curve or the sign of curvature in the plane, or the normal to the osculating circle or the helicity of the curve in higher dimensional spaces. Since computer aided design packages often provide both these metrics for curves, this dependence of magnitude of curvature on them can be very useful when the package does not also provide the curvature of the curve at every point.
The curvature at a point p on the curve, defined as the reciprocal of the radius of curvature there, is given by the limit, as a second point q approaches p, of √(24(a-c)/a3), where a and c abbreviate a(p,q) and c(p,q) respectively. (The denominator can equally well be taken as c3.)
For full generality the two sides of p should be considered independently so as to cater for the case of a C2-discontinuity at p. When the limit exists, this is the curvature at p on the q side, with zero curvature indicating that the curve is straight at p on that side. The curve is curvature-continuous or C2-continuous at p just when the limits from both sides coincide. When there exists independent reason to assume curvature continuity it suffices to measure curvature from one side only. Nonexistence of the limit on either side of p indicates some pathological departure from C2-continuity in the neighborhood of p on that side, as opposed to a mere isolated curvature discontinuity at p.
The formula is readily derived from the behavior of the osculating circle, which is tangent to the curve at p and lies in its plane of curvature there. An arc of length a in a circle of radius r has chord length c = 2r sin(a/2r), whose Taylor expansion about 0 out to its cubic term approximates c as a − a3/24r2, immediately yielding the above formula for curvature 1/r.
This organization of a curve as a space with two metrics constitutes a naturally arising example of an intensionally defined curve, since the two metrics can exist on their own without reference to any higher-dimensional space embedding the curve. One then typically imposes axioms governing such stand-alone structures, the obvious axioms here, in addition to the four Fréchet axioms for each of the two metrics, being a(p,q) + a(q,r) = a(p,r) (the above-mentioned strengthening of the triangle inequality to an equality characterizing that metric as the arc length of the curve) and c(p,q) ≤ a(p,q) as the counterpart for curves of the triangle inequality for metric spaces. A further axiom that c(p,q) tends to a(p,q) as the latter tends to zero imbues such curves with a certain weak sense of smoothness, strengthened to the more concrete requirement of C2-continuity with the condition that curvature be well-defined everywhere as determined by the formula for it.
For a parametrically defined space curve as , its curvature is:
Given a function r(t) with values in R3, the curvature at a given value of is
where and correspond to the first and second derivatives of r(t), respectively, and is the cross (vector) product. (Note that this formula is the vector notation of F[x,y,z] above.)
When a one dimensional curve lies on a two dimensional surface embedded in three dimensions R3, further measures of curvature are available, which take the surface's unit-normal vector, u into account. These are the normal curvature, geodesic curvature and geodesic torsion. Any non-singular curve on a smooth surface will have its tangent vector T lying in the tangent plane of the surface orthogonal to the normal vector. The normal curvature, kn, is the curvature of the curve projected onto the plane containing the curve's tangent T and the surface normal u; the geodesic curvature, kg, is the curvature of the curve projected onto the surface's tangent plane; and the geodesic torsion (or relative torsion), τr, measures the rate of change of the surface normal around the curve's tangent.
Let the curve be a unit speed curve and let t = u × T so that T, u, t form an orthonormal basis: the Darboux frame. The above quantities are related by:
All curves with the same tangent vector will have the same normal curvature, which is the same as the curvature of the curve obtained by intersecting the surface with the plane containing T and u. Taking all possible tangent vectors then the maximum and minimum values of the normal curvature at a point are called the principal curvatures, k1 and k2, and the directions of the corresponding tangent vectors are called principal directions.
In contrast to curves, which do not have intrinsic curvature, but do have extrinsic curvature (they only have a curvature given an embedding), surfaces can have intrinsic curvature, independent of an embedding.
Here we adopt the convention that a curvature is taken to be positive if the curve turns in the same direction as the surface's chosen normal, otherwise negative.
The Gaussian curvature, named after Carl Friedrich Gauss, is equal to the product of the principal curvatures, k1k2. It has the dimension of 1/length2 and is positive for spheres, negative for one-sheet hyperboloids and zero for planes. It determines whether a surface is locally convex (when it is positive) or locally saddle (when it is negative).
The above definition of Gaussian curvature is extrinsic in that it uses the surface's embedding in R3, normal vectors, external planes etc. Gaussian curvature is however in fact an intrinsic property of the surface, meaning it does not depend on the particular embedding of the surface; intuitively, this means that ants living on the surface could determine the Gaussian curvature. For example, an ant living on a sphere could measure the sum of the interior angles of a triangle and determine that it was greater than 180 degrees, implying that the space it inhabited had positive curvature. On the other hand, an ant living on a cylinder would not detect any such departure from Euclidean geometry, in particular the ant could not detect that the two surfaces have different mean curvatures (see below) which is a purely extrinsic type of curvature.
Formally, Gaussian curvature only depends on the Riemannian metric of the surface. This is Gauss' celebrated Theorema Egregium, which he found while concerned with geographic surveys and mapmaking.
An intrinsic definition of the Gaussian curvature at a point P is the following: imagine an ant which is tied to P with a short thread of length r. She runs around P while the thread is completely stretched and measures the length C(r) of one complete trip around P. If the surface were flat, she would find C(r) = 2πr. On curved surfaces, the formula for C(r) will be different, and the Gaussian curvature K at the point P can be computed by the Bertrand–Diquet–Puiseux theorem as
The integral of the Gaussian curvature over the whole surface is closely related to the surface's Euler characteristic; see the Gauss-Bonnet theorem.
The discrete analog of curvature, corresponding to curvature being concentrated at a point and particularly useful for polyhedra, is the (angular) defect; the analog for the Gauss-Bonnet theorem is Descartes' theorem on total angular defect.
Because curvature can be defined without reference to an embedding space, it is not necessary that a surface be embedded in a higher dimensional space in order to be curved. Such an intrinsically curved two-dimensional surface is a simple example of a Riemannian manifold.
The mean curvature is equal to the sum of the principal curvatures, k1+k2, over 2. It has the dimension of 1/length. Mean curvature is closely related to the first variation of surface area, in particular a minimal surface such as a soap film, has mean curvature zero and a soap bubble has constant mean curvature. Unlike Gauss curvature, the mean curvature is extrinsic and depends on the embedding, for instance, a cylinder and a plane are locally isometric but the mean curvature of a plane is zero while that of a cylinder is nonzero.
k1 and k2 are the eigenvalues of the second fundamental form.
By extension of the former argument, a space of three or more dimensions can be intrinsically curved; the full mathematical description is described at curvature of Riemannian manifolds. Again, the curved space may or may not be conceived as being embedded in a higher-dimensional space. In recent physics jargon, the embedding space is known as the bulk and the embedded space as a p-brane where p is the number of dimensions; thus a surface (membrane) is a 2-brane; normal space is a 3-brane etc.
After the discovery of the intrinsic definition of curvature, which is closely connected with non-Euclidean geometry, many mathematicians and scientists questioned whether ordinary physical space might be curved, although the success of Euclidean geometry up to that time meant that the radius of curvature must be astronomically large. In the theory of general relativity, which describes gravity and cosmology, the idea is slightly generalised to the "curvature of space-time"; in relativity theory space-time is a pseudo-Riemannian manifold. Once a time coordinate is defined, the three-dimensional space corresponding to a particular time is generally a curved Riemannian manifold; but since the time coordinate choice is largely arbitrary, it is the underlying space-time curvature that is physically significant.
Although an arbitrarily-curved space is very complex to describe, the curvature of a space which is locally isotropic and homogeneous is described by a single Gaussian curvature, as for a surface; mathematically these are strong conditions, but they correspond to reasonable physical assumptions (all points and all directions are indistinguishable). A positive curvature corresponds to the inverse square radius of curvature; an example is a sphere or hypersphere. An example of negatively curved space is hyperbolic geometry. A space or space-time with zero curvature is called flat. For example, Euclidean space is an example of a flat space, and Minkowski space is an example of a flat space-time. There are other examples of flat geometries in both settings, though. A torus or a cylinder can both be given flat metrics, but differ in their topology. Other topologies are also possible for curved space. See also shape of the universe.
The mathematical notion of curvature is also defined in much more general contexts[1] , for example in case of an external fibre bundle attached to a tangent space of a manifold. E.g., in case of , a nontrivial Lie group, attached to the Minkowski space of relativistic physics, the "curvature"-2-form of the fibre bundle is for n=3 identical with the colour field strength of the gluons in quantum chromodynamics, where is the antisymmetric wedge product of Lie algebra elements, and where g is the coupling strength of the just-mentioned high-energy physics theory, while is the vector potential 1-form, corresponding in physics directly to the gluon field.
|